January 16, 2007
A hostile with key information is a hostile down.When they revealed that this season's MacGuffin would be a suitcase bomb, I thought, "season two again." But this time, they exploded it inside the city, so does that mean we're in for a post-apocalyptic L.A. scenario? If so, I hope Snake Plisskin makes an appearance, what a team he and Jack would make. Snake & Jake, the two whispering heroes.
Posted by: annika at
10:20 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: reagan80 at January 16, 2007 12:33 PM (wkyrW)
Posted by: Casca at January 16, 2007 12:57 PM (Y7t14)
Posted by: strawman at January 17, 2007 02:47 PM (9ySL4)
Posted by: shelly at January 17, 2007 04:58 PM (SLFj+)
January 11, 2007
Soccer is like communism. All true Americans shun and despise it. Now, MLS has managed to pluck has-been soccer megastar David Beckham in their latest attempt to force feed soccer to US sports fans.
Well let me be the first to say I won't stand for it. Americans gave the world baseball, football and basketball, and this is how the rest of the world repays us? With eurotrash David and Victoria Beckham?
Just say no to the hype that is sure to surround Beckham's Coming to America tour. I'm already feeling nauseated by the inevitable oh-so-serious Nike ads featuring Beckham bicycle kicking a soccer ball at supersonic speed through the back of a net fifty miles away — in grainy black and white with a techno soundtrack. Puleeeze, spare me. Soccer will always remain just notch between chess and tetherball on the excitometer, no matter how many spice girls you dress it up with.
Just say no to the Beckham hype!
Soccerus est communismus!
Posted by: annika at
02:51 PM
| Comments (26)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Roach at January 11, 2007 03:32 PM (1BjlW)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 11, 2007 03:40 PM (uSj2m)
Posted by: Nicksta at January 11, 2007 05:11 PM (TpGfG)
Posted by: Casca at January 11, 2007 06:36 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: joe at January 11, 2007 08:39 PM (Tnli8)
Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 12, 2007 06:38 AM (TDwc6)
Posted by: Frank at January 12, 2007 08:53 AM (YHZAl)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 09:29 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: strawman at January 12, 2007 10:32 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: elmondohummus at January 12, 2007 12:29 PM (J+r3D)
Posted by: stiknstein at January 12, 2007 03:10 PM (4djxo)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 12, 2007 03:34 PM (Wzozk)
Posted by: annika at January 12, 2007 04:00 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: stiknstein at January 12, 2007 05:33 PM (4djxo)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 06:05 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at January 12, 2007 06:57 PM (cOyko)
Posted by: strawman at January 13, 2007 10:24 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: Mark at January 14, 2007 12:42 AM (33r5+)
Posted by: Casca at January 14, 2007 01:36 AM (2gORp)
Posted by: shelly at January 15, 2007 08:49 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at January 15, 2007 10:19 AM (yVSiH)
Posted by: Mark at January 15, 2007 02:55 PM (iY86I)
Posted by: Casca at January 15, 2007 10:13 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: SH at January 16, 2007 11:07 AM (tt+bJ)
Posted by: Joules at January 16, 2007 11:45 AM (u4CYb)
Posted by: part america at January 29, 2007 03:26 AM (GY5SM)
January 10, 2007
As I've said before, arguing about whether we should set a timetable for withdrawal is stupid. We already have one, and the deadline is January 20th, 2009. No amount of wishful thinking by war hawks can change the fact that unless there is significant and obvious improvement in Iraq, and soon, the next president of the United States will be elected on a platform of withdrawal.
Therefore, we who long for success should know that this is our last chance to succeed. We have less than two years. Those who oppose us know that this is the endgame for Iraq too. Our foreign enemies will do everything they can to embarrass U.S. forces by creating atrocities or inventing them wherever possible. Our domestic enemies will then do all they can to portray these atrocities as evidence of the failure, futility and immorality of our purpose.
Whether we succeed or not depends very little on what you or I say here at home, given those facts. Our men and women at arms will accomplish everything that is asked of them, as they always have. The question is whether the President and his generals will have the guts to keep fighting when the inevitable criticism hits fever pitch. Based on past experience, I need convincing.
This country is anti-war; our domestic enemies have already won that battle (with the unwitting help, I might add, of Mr. Rumsfeld and the commander-in-chief himself). The President's speech tonight will not magically transform the public's fatigue any more than it can change the Washington press corps into a group of people who love their country. If success is possible at this late hour, Mr. Bush will have to do it without the support of Congress, the media, or the majority of the American people.
But as President Bush explained less than half an hour ago, failure in Iraq would be a disaster. And therefore, I hope he understands above all that now is the time for results.
Technorati: iraq, bush, bush+speech
Posted by: annika at
07:57 PM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Joules at January 10, 2007 08:48 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2007 09:59 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Frank at January 11, 2007 08:34 AM (YHZAl)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 11:03 AM (j8oa6)
Posted by: gcotharn at January 11, 2007 12:45 PM (xq9zD)
Posted by: Casca at January 11, 2007 06:48 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 07:20 PM (IYDwv)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 07:31 PM (IYDwv)
Posted by: Jenn at January 11, 2007 08:31 PM (d3Ou4)
Posted by: blu at January 12, 2007 12:15 AM (IYDwv)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 09:49 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: strawman at January 12, 2007 10:11 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: blu at January 12, 2007 12:18 PM (IYDwv)
Posted by: strawman at January 12, 2007 12:48 PM (9ySL4)
Posted by: blu at January 12, 2007 03:00 PM (IYDwv)
Posted by: annika at January 12, 2007 04:12 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 06:25 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: will at January 13, 2007 04:30 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: reagan80 at January 13, 2007 07:46 PM (wkyrW)
Posted by: will at January 15, 2007 01:22 PM (h7Ciu)
The Rattlesnake and Scorpionby Ruth Yoshiko Okimoto
Said the Scorpion to the Rattlesnake,
"What manner of commotion is happening here?
The sawing of lumber and pounding of nails,
black tarpaper falls and covers my trail.
Tall fence posts pierce deep into the ground
securing chainlink fences and barbed wire from town."Said the Rattlesnake to the Scorpion,
"Indeed, huge pipes obstruct and crisscross my path,
and loud swishing noises disturb my sleep.
Why, I went foraging for food and found
my favorite hunting ground vanished today
and more will dwindle, I've heard them say."Said the Scorpion to the Rattlesnake,
"And worse even yet, small human fingers foolishly grab
my sisters, brothers, cousins, and all,
and drown them in jars filled with alcohol."
"How foolish, indeed," replied the Rattlesnake,
"Don't they know of your sting, my venomous bite?"Said the Scorpion to the Rattlesnake,
"What kind of human would dare intrude into our sacred place?
We've lived on this land for centuries, I'm told,
so, why do they come here to ravage and destroy?
We've lived in peace, both you and I,
with no intent to hurt or annoy."Said the Rattlesnake to the Scorpion,
"Some humans, I'm told, regard those who differ in skin
or thought with what they call 'justifiable' hate."
"As you know," continued the Rattlesnake,
"humans are the most dangerous animal of all;
they kill with lethal weapons ten feet tall."Asked the Scorpion of the Rattlesnake,
"So what do you think they are building here,
in the midst of our desert home?"
Answered the Rattlesnake with a somber voice,
"It's something menacing, and I fear
portend of dangers yet unclear."
[This poem was written in 1942, while Okimoto was interned at Poston Relocation Center, Arizona.]
Posted by: annika at
03:42 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: will at January 10, 2007 07:19 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: annika at January 10, 2007 08:02 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: will at January 10, 2007 08:54 PM (h7Ciu)
Sullivan, a 46-year-old builder from Stowe, was aboard the United Airlines flight on the second leg of his trip home from San Francisco, where he and his wife Helena had been visiting their sons. He awoke from a nap shortly before landing and noticed something strange.That's right, scorpions on a muhfukkin plane!"My right leg felt like it was asleep, but that was isolated to one spot, and it felt like it was being jabbed with a sharp piece of plastic or something."
The second sting came after the plane had landed and the Sullivans were waiting for their bags at the luggage carousel. Sullivan rolled up his cuff to investigate, and the scorpion fell out.
"It felt like a shock, a tingly thing. Someone screamed, 'It's a scorpion,'" Sullivan recalled. Another passenger stepped on the two-inch arachnid, and someone suggested Sullivan seek medical help.
He scooped up the scorpion and headed to the hospital in Burlington. His wife stopped at the United counter and was told the plane they were on had flown from Houston to Chicago. The Sullivans surmised the scorpion boarded in Texas.
"The airlines tell you can't bring water or shampoo on a plane," Helena Sullivan said. But the scorpion did make it aboard, she said.
In other Samuel L. Jackson related news, check out this awesome t-shirt.
t-shirt recommendation via Dawn.
Posted by: annika at
12:53 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2007 02:27 PM (Y7t14)
Posted by: The Law Fairy at January 10, 2007 02:59 PM (XUsiG)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 10, 2007 05:05 PM (J+r3D)
Posted by: Frank at January 11, 2007 07:38 AM (YHZAl)
January 09, 2007
Posted by: annika at
10:09 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 09, 2007 10:45 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: reagan80 at January 10, 2007 06:38 AM (wkyrW)
Posted by: Gordon at January 10, 2007 08:06 AM (hBifL)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 11, 2007 01:06 AM (ahkO2)
Me: "Yes, I'm calling to report a gas leak."
PG&E rep: "How do you know there's a gas leak?"
Me: "I can smell it."
PG&E rep: "Okay, what do you smell?"
Me: "Gas."
PG&E rep: "Describe the smell for me."
Me: "It smells like gas. Are you going to send someone out or not?"
PG&E rep: "I need to first verify if there's a problem."
Me: "There is. I have a gas leak."
PG&E rep: "Does it smell like rotten eggs?"
Me: "I... I've never smelled rotten eggs. I don't know. It smells like gas."
PG&E rep: "Natural gas is odorless."
Me: "But I've smelled gas before and this is what it smells like."
PG&E rep: "You can't smell natural gas. It's odorless."
Me: "But I smell gas."
PG&E rep: "For safety reasons, we put a chemical in the gas in order to make it detectable."
Me: "Alright, then I smell the chemical you put in the gas in order to make it detectable."
PG&E rep: "Okay, does it smell like rotten eggs?"
Me: "Look, I have no idea what a rotten egg smells like. I don't know what kind of home you grew up in, but in my family we didn't keep a lot of rotten eggs around the house."
PG&E rep: "I'm sorry ma'am, but we get a lot of false alarms and I can't send anyone over to your house unless I can verify whether there's a gas leak."
Me: "Well, how else would I know I have a gas leak other than by smelling gas? What is it about 'I smell gas' that you don't understand..."
This went on for a few minutes longer and finally the a-hole relented and sent a repairman out. Turns out that the guy next door had died and his stove was leaking gas like crazy. In all honesty, I might have been smelling gas odor mixed with dead guy. But I suppose if I had said that, my call would have been transferred to the coroner's office instead.
Posted by: annika at
03:26 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 375 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 09, 2007 03:35 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: reagan80 at January 09, 2007 04:49 PM (wkyrW)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 09, 2007 05:55 PM (90ofN)
Posted by: Yolo Cowboy at January 10, 2007 05:29 PM (vk71m)
Posted by: annika at January 10, 2007 06:30 PM (1EshY)
January 08, 2007
I thought it would be a low scoring game. It's halftime and they've already gone over the over.
I actually like that Tressel went for it on 4th from their own 29, but they should have converted.
I thought FL's kicker sucked. Who's that dude?
I don't think the game is over though. If it was the NFL, yes. But this is college, and that's what I love about NCAAF. Anything can happen. (Such as sucky Florida whooping OSU, I guess.)
The OSU band is playing "My Heart Will Go On?!" Ouch, the irony!
Third Quarter Update: FL's on the 2 yard line. That's it, I'm done. This game's too boring to sit through the rest. OSU did not show up tonight. Congrats to Florida. I guess the BCS worked, though I still would rather have seen SC play for the title.
Posted by: annika at
08:03 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: kyle8 at January 08, 2007 10:18 PM (9B/3g)
Posted by: Casca at January 08, 2007 10:58 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: shelly at January 09, 2007 02:16 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 09, 2007 07:49 AM (Y7t14)
Posted by: Hugo at January 09, 2007 11:13 AM (yLeev)
Posted by: shelly at January 09, 2007 08:26 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 10, 2007 03:24 AM (eqm3m)
Posted by: annika at
09:45 AM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mark at January 08, 2007 11:32 AM (krump)
Posted by: blu at January 08, 2007 11:58 AM (LtzGE)
Posted by: Casca at January 08, 2007 12:40 PM (Y7t14)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 08, 2007 03:04 PM (9B/3g)
Posted by: MarkD at January 08, 2007 03:46 PM (VyQ5A)
Posted by: Joules at January 08, 2007 04:36 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: reliapundit at January 08, 2007 09:14 PM (xyulJ)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 06:04 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Joints at January 09, 2007 07:32 AM (Dh/a/)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 08:06 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Frank at January 09, 2007 09:19 AM (YHZAl)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 09:47 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Joints at January 09, 2007 09:58 AM (Dh/a/)
Posted by: wiil at January 09, 2007 10:58 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: blu at January 09, 2007 11:18 AM (LtzGE)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 11:19 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: annika at January 09, 2007 12:30 PM (zAOEU)
Posted by: Spanky at January 09, 2007 02:21 PM (wkyrW)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 02:31 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 02:56 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: annika at January 09, 2007 02:59 PM (zAOEU)
Posted by: blu at January 09, 2007 04:18 PM (LtzGE)
Posted by: blu at January 09, 2007 04:21 PM (LtzGE)
Posted by: reagan80 at January 09, 2007 04:47 PM (wkyrW)
Posted by: will at January 09, 2007 05:11 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: annika at January 09, 2007 08:28 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: will at January 10, 2007 08:53 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 10:35 AM (j8oa6)
Posted by: will at January 11, 2007 02:44 PM (GzvlQ)
Posted by: will at January 11, 2007 02:46 PM (GzvlQ)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 03:04 PM (j8oa6)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 03:25 PM (j8oa6)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 03:28 PM (j8oa6)
Posted by: blu at January 11, 2007 08:25 PM (IYDwv)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 09:22 AM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: will at January 12, 2007 06:07 PM (h7Ciu)
January 06, 2007
CENTURY CITY, CA — Sources close to mega-pop star Lindsay Logan have confirmed that her emergency appendectomy was the result of a little known experimental procedure called "toxicological remote analysis of medical photography."
The new technique uses super-high magnification of ordinary photographs to enable early diagnosis of many life threatening ailments, according to doctors at Cedars Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles.
"By analyzing any external snapshot under extreme magnification one can often see inside the patient's body," explained Dr. Valderramma, a pioneer in the new technique. "It all depends of course, on the particular orifice present on the photographic film."
Dr. Valderramma, an otorhinolaryngologist, often uses toxicological remote analysis of medical photography to screen his own patients for tonsillectomies.
"The technique is most useful for diagnosing tonsillitis, since photographs showing a patient's mouth are commonly available," said Valderramma. Evidently, it was only a matter of time before someone applied the same method to check for disorders of the lower torso, such as appendicitis.
"Nowadays anyone can easily obtain photographs of a young lady's cootch on the internet," explained Dr. Valderramma. "So in a way, Ms. Lohan is quite lucky that someone performed the analysis on one of her paparazzi photos. Her own skankiness may have saved her life."
"It's just another example of the wonders of modern science," the doctor added with a wide grin.
Posted by: annika at
06:08 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: shelly at January 07, 2007 05:47 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 07, 2007 04:26 PM (9NmRp)
Posted by: Joules at January 07, 2007 10:34 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 08, 2007 08:54 AM (xHyDY)
Posted by: Mark at January 08, 2007 11:34 AM (krump)
Posted by: Matt at January 08, 2007 11:56 AM (10G2T)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 08, 2007 02:44 PM (xHyDY)
Posted by: shelly at January 09, 2007 02:22 AM (SLFj+)
On to game two: Dallas at Seattle.
Both teams are well coached, yet have stumbled lately.
Romo has played poorly in his last couple of games, but Seattle's secondary may be vulnerable from injuries sustained last weekend.
Hasselbeck throws more interceptions, but Romo fumbles more.
Tough game to pick, but I'm going with the superior quarterback, at least on paper, Tony Romo. Plus, he makes great ribs.
Seattle is the favorite and the spreads range from one to three points. Take the three points, bet Dallas, and laugh at the suckers later. This time for real.
Update: My advice to Tony Romo is this: from now on, be wary of any lady cops named Einhorn.
Update 2: My final record for the year, with 16 games, is 8-6-2. The two pushes tell you exactly how good I am!
Posted by: annika at
05:49 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 06, 2007 09:13 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 07, 2007 12:05 AM (90ofN)
Posted by: shelly at January 07, 2007 05:51 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 07, 2007 09:21 AM (2gORp)
Posted by: shelly at January 07, 2007 11:47 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 07, 2007 04:18 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: DHammett at January 08, 2007 11:19 AM (J7BEJ)
Posted by: Casca at January 08, 2007 03:44 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: annika at January 08, 2007 08:02 PM (1EshY)
Indy's run defense is ranked last.
KC's RB Larry Johnson is the league's second best rusher, and having a career year.
Dungy and Edwards are great friends, but Dungy will be looking to avenge Indy's 41-0 loss to Edwards the last time they met in the playoffs.
Manning needs to prove he can win in the playoffs.
I think Indy will win, but LJ and the Colts crappy defense make it too tempting not to take KC plus the 7 points. Go with KC+7 and laugh at the suckers later.
Result: Indianapolis kills the Chiefs, 23 to 8. I lose.
Posted by: annika at
01:14 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 06, 2007 05:21 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: annika at January 06, 2007 05:36 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: shelly at January 06, 2007 05:48 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 06, 2007 07:09 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 06, 2007 11:48 PM (90ofN)
January 05, 2007
OMG!
Posted by: annika at
10:36 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: kyle8 at January 05, 2007 03:11 PM (OyZ8T)
Posted by: Joules at January 05, 2007 09:14 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: JMcD at January 06, 2007 06:34 AM (KpoGU)
January 03, 2007
Full disclosure: my old car gets at least 35 mpg without the benefit of a single bumper sticker.
h/t 6MB.
Posted by: annika at
08:47 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 03, 2007 09:26 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Mark at January 04, 2007 10:49 AM (krump)
Posted by: david foster at January 04, 2007 11:09 AM (/Z304)
Posted by: will at January 04, 2007 12:10 PM (GzvlQ)
Posted by: elmondohummus at January 04, 2007 01:01 PM (xHyDY)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 04, 2007 01:25 PM (xHyDY)
Posted by: strawman at January 04, 2007 02:00 PM (9ySL4)
Posted by: will at January 04, 2007 02:07 PM (GzvlQ)
Posted by: Casca at January 04, 2007 04:55 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: will at January 04, 2007 08:20 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Joules at January 04, 2007 09:40 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: annika at January 05, 2007 01:22 PM (VqvfN)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 06, 2007 06:04 AM (tVIRZ)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 06, 2007 06:05 AM (tVIRZ)
Posted by: strawman at January 06, 2007 12:07 PM (9ySL4)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at January 06, 2007 10:21 PM (93RY0)
But that's not important; what I think is important is he's right about what that something about a martini is.
Tanqueray, in my case.
A Drink With Something In It
There is something about a Martini,
A tingle remarkably pleasant;
A yellow, a mellow Martini;
I wish I had one at present.
There is something about a Martini,
Ere the dining and dancing begin,
And to tell you the truth,
It is not the vermouth--
I think that perhaps it's the gin.
Posted by: Victor at
11:11 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Joules at January 03, 2007 12:48 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Mike C. at January 03, 2007 01:12 PM (0Co69)
Posted by: Joules at January 03, 2007 03:02 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Mike C. at January 04, 2007 04:25 AM (0Co69)
Posted by: Wolf at January 04, 2007 06:18 AM (qC7fx)
Posted by: Joules at January 04, 2007 09:43 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Casca at January 04, 2007 11:36 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Joules at January 05, 2007 09:17 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: shelly at January 06, 2007 04:58 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Mike C. at January 07, 2007 06:08 PM (Eodj2)
January 02, 2007
Okay, the NFL regular season is over and my MNF pick record was 7-5-2, which is not bad. That's a .571 winning percentage, which would get me in the playoffs if I was a football team. I made predictions in 14 games, but I really should pick two more to make it a 16 game season. I don't know where I lost track of those two games.
To make it totally fair, I will predict the next two upcoming games, which happen to be KC-Indy and Dallas-Seattle.
Posted by: annika at
08:17 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 02, 2007 11:28 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Mark at January 03, 2007 01:23 PM (krump)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 04, 2007 04:17 PM (1XEr+)
Posted by: Casca at January 04, 2007 11:45 PM (2gORp)
December 30, 2006
We invaded Iraq to bring democracy to that part of the world, because doing so will in theory make us safer here at home. Not only have we not yet succeeded in that purpose, but our ultimate success (as well as the very theory our plan is based upon) is very much in doubt right now. No matter how much Saddam may have deserved what he got, I'd just rather save my celebrating for the day our troops return home victorious.
Posted by: annika at
12:53 PM
| Comments (40)
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: david foster at December 30, 2006 01:00 PM (/Z304)
Posted by: annika at December 30, 2006 01:12 PM (1EshY)
Posted by: Rob at December 30, 2006 04:49 PM (o0jpu)
Posted by: Jake at December 30, 2006 05:11 PM (V6rxT)
Posted by: Joules at December 30, 2006 05:38 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Casca at December 30, 2006 05:48 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: The Law Fairy at December 30, 2006 06:27 PM (XUsiG)
Posted by: elmondohummus at December 30, 2006 10:21 PM (BjOjj)
Posted by: Mike C. at December 31, 2006 07:12 AM (0Co69)
Posted by: kb at December 31, 2006 07:45 AM (cOyko)
Posted by: shelly at December 31, 2006 10:10 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at December 31, 2006 10:50 AM (2gORp)
Posted by: kb at December 31, 2006 12:11 PM (cOyko)
Posted by: bob at December 31, 2006 04:28 PM (D3RjI)
Posted by: reagan80 at December 31, 2006 07:58 PM (4VV/k)
Posted by: elmondohummus at December 31, 2006 08:50 PM (BjOjj)
Posted by: skippystalin at December 31, 2006 11:16 PM (OzEoC)
Posted by: shelly at January 01, 2007 04:20 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 01, 2007 07:09 AM (2gORp)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 01, 2007 08:10 AM (Ng/nU)
Posted by: Casca at January 01, 2007 10:50 AM (2gORp)
Posted by: shelly at January 01, 2007 12:36 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Roach at January 01, 2007 09:39 PM (+/dZk)
Posted by: shelly at January 02, 2007 04:11 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Casca at January 02, 2007 07:36 AM (Y7t14)
Posted by: strawman at January 02, 2007 09:43 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: Casca at January 02, 2007 09:48 AM (Y7t14)
Posted by: strawman at January 02, 2007 10:24 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: shelly at January 02, 2007 10:32 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: strawman at January 02, 2007 10:40 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: blu at January 02, 2007 11:12 AM (LtzGE)
Posted by: strawman at January 02, 2007 11:33 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: kyle8 at January 02, 2007 03:01 PM (QGxX6)
Posted by: shelly at January 02, 2007 04:20 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: strawman at January 02, 2007 06:55 PM (9ySL4)
Posted by: shelly at January 02, 2007 09:24 PM (SLFj+)
Posted by: Steve Bryant at January 03, 2007 08:51 AM (RcKtK)
Posted by: Casca at January 03, 2007 09:07 AM (Y7t14)
Posted by: strawman at January 03, 2007 10:13 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: will at January 04, 2007 12:31 PM (GzvlQ)

According to the San Francisco Chronicle
When Elvis Presley died in 1977, there were an estimated 37 Elvis impersonators in the world. By 1993, there were 48,000 Elvis impersonators, an exponential increase. Extrapolating from this, by 2010 there will be 2.5 billion Elvis impersonators. The population of the world will be 7.5 billion by 2010. Every 3rd person will be an Elvis impersonator by 2010.That's one third of the Earth's total population, or 22,500,000,000 people. I don't know about you, but I'm not sure I want to be an Elvis impersonator.
To be sure, not all of the finest workings of global population science is yet fully understood to the finest grain. However, all of the basics are absolutely clear. The Elvis impersonator crisis is real, humans are causing the problem, and the solutions are available to us now. It is not too late to avoid the worst. All that is needed is the political will to act.
h/t Some Words To Not.
Posted by: annika at
11:54 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jake at December 30, 2006 12:28 PM (V6rxT)
Posted by: Casca at December 30, 2006 12:33 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Kevin Kim at December 30, 2006 11:50 PM (1PcL3)
Posted by: JMcD at December 31, 2006 03:33 AM (KpoGU)
Posted by: Casca at December 31, 2006 10:08 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Joules at January 02, 2007 12:03 PM (u4CYb)

Posted by: annika at
01:43 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: annika at
01:40 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at December 30, 2006 08:11 AM (2gORp)
80 queries taking 0.1413 seconds, 410 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








